AI Created photo can´t have copyright protection

The US Copyright Office has decided that an AI-Created photo can´t have copyright protection because the images “are not the product of human authorship,” To justify the decision, the Copyright Office cites previous cases where people weren’t able to copyright words or songs that listed “non-human spiritual beings” or the Holy Spirit as the author — as well as the infamous incident where a selfie was taken by a monkey.


All this had come to light because The US Copyright Office has reconsidered the copyright protection it granted last fall to Kristina Kashtanova for her comic book Zarya of the Dawn, It featured pictures created by feeding text prompts to Midjourney, an artificial intelligence image generator.


Is understandable why anyone would like the help of an AI-Generator , there are several benefits to using an AI photo generator:

Efficiency: An AI photo generator can produce large volumes of images quickly and with minimal human input, making it a time-efficient solution for tasks such as image curation or content creation.

Customization: AI photo generators can be trained to produce images that fit specific criteria, such as color scheme, subject matter, or composition, making it possible to generate images that are tailored to a particular project or brand.

Cost-effective: Using an AI photo generator can be less expensive than hiring a professional photographer or purchasing stock photos, particularly for small or one-time projects.

Consistency: An AI photo generator can produce images that have a consistent look and feel, which can be useful for maintaining brand identity or creating a cohesive visual aesthetic.

Novelty: AI photo generators can produce images that are unique and unexpected, making them a useful tool for creative projects or for generating ideas.


However, it's important to note that the quality of the images produced by an AI photo generator will depend on the quality of the underlying algorithms and data used to train the model. It may not always be able to produce images that meet a high level of artistic or creative standards, and there is still a place for human photographers and designers in many fields.


So what do you think, should the law protect by copyright this images?